Whisky Investment Proof

No Comments on Whisky Investment Proof

There’s a lot of controversy that surrounds the topic of whisky investment, and we’re not going to get into an extended debate over the rights and wrongs of it as the issue comes up almost constantly and people tend to have their own entrenched opinions.  But we recently acquired a bottle that proves that at least for some whiskies it’s definitely worked.  We make no other claim than that.

Check this out: a 1938 Glenlivet, bottled by Gordon & Macphail no later than 1979.  The price sticker attached to the cap proves that the original retail price for this bottle in the 1970s – in Harrods, no less – was a paltry £5.  A fiver!

glenlivet_1938_insetsmall1

Two points of interest here:

1. According to the Bank of England’s inflation calculator, £5 in 1979 is the equivalent of just £21.42 in today’s money. Imagine being able to walk into Harrod’s (or anywhere else) today and buying a 30-something year old Glenlivet for £21.42.  It’s pretty hard, isn’t it?

2. The current retail price of this bottle on TWE is £1750.  If you invested a fiver in a UK FTSE 100 index tracking fund when it started in 1984, it’d be worth about £32 now. If you’d put your £5 in the bank in 1979, even with compound interest you’d have about forty quid now.  That’s about eight times your investment – not bad, on the face of it.

But not as good as the whisky.  If the original retail value was £21.42 in today’s money, the retail price of that bottle today is somewhere in the region of eighty times the original.

Not a bad increase, however you want to cut it.

Posted in Scotch Whisky, Whisky News
Tagged

Leave a Reply

xx

Scroll To Top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this. Find out more

Close