<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bruichladdich X4: Exclusive Picture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/</link>
	<description>A Whisky-Lover&#039;s Whisky Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael J Wood</title>
		<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael J Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/?p=486#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Bruichladdich made their whisky from malted barley. The original sources I have read (with no supporting archive I might add) say :&quot;The trestarig and usquebaugh‑baul, are both made of oats.&quot;
The oats would give different structures but no doubt similar results !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruichladdich made their whisky from malted barley. The original sources I have read (with no supporting archive I might add) say :&#8221;The trestarig and usquebaugh‑baul, are both made of oats.&#8221;<br />
The oats would give different structures but no doubt similar results !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter</title>
		<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/?p=486#comment-238</guid>
		<description>It smells a little like gin or dutch &#039;jenever&#039;, but the taste is without discussion whisky, and a nice one indeed. For around €40/bottle it&#039;s well worth the bang for the bucks. Jus wish they&#039;d bottle it at full 90%, without water!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It smells a little like gin or dutch &#8216;jenever&#8217;, but the taste is without discussion whisky, and a nice one indeed. For around €40/bottle it&#8217;s well worth the bang for the bucks. Jus wish they&#8217;d bottle it at full 90%, without water!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Basics of Distillation &#171; The &#8220;Officially Unofficial&#8221; Bruichladdich Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>The Basics of Distillation &#171; The &#8220;Officially Unofficial&#8221; Bruichladdich Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/?p=486#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] has created a quadruple-distilled monster called &#8220;X4&#8221; that is nicknamed &#8220;Perilous Whisky.&#8221; When it went into the casks it was over 90% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has created a quadruple-distilled monster called &#8220;X4&#8221; that is nicknamed &#8220;Perilous Whisky.&#8221; When it went into the casks it was over 90% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butephoto</title>
		<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>butephoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/?p=486#comment-180</guid>
		<description>I often wish that more distilleries would sell the new spirit, but not at this kind of price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often wish that more distilleries would sell the new spirit, but not at this kind of price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgulien</title>
		<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>bgulien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/?p=486#comment-178</guid>
		<description>BruichLaddich as we know  and love it.
Still have some X4+1, so I will wait a few years till it matures a little bit more.
The X4 has a lot of potential, but at 2 years it has some way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BruichLaddich as we know  and love it.<br />
Still have some X4+1, so I will wait a few years till it matures a little bit more.<br />
The X4 has a lot of potential, but at 2 years it has some way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pär Caldenby</title>
		<link>http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/2008/11/bruichladdich-x4-exclusive-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Pär Caldenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thewhiskyexchange.com/?p=486#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Well,

It is about 313 years late for being an innovation as such, obviously, but a re-discovery perhaps? Having tried the X4+1 at Bruichladdich, it is obviously not yet a whisky such as we know it. But it is on its way. And if one just adds another distillation to Auchentoshan or Hazelburn, it would very much still be a whisky, only stronger in alcohol and even more refined. It would not be akin to vodka, I&#039;d say, after only one more distillation, provided there is a decently wide spirit cut etc.

I think it is a fair extension and the excitement and debate it has produced would suggest it is also commercially viable. Bit rich on the hype, perhaps, but then again, I&#039;m not too keen on much marketing these days anyway...

I will be interested in trying this. Pity it wasn&#039;t released at full blaze strength though. One point of sale lost, if I may say so.

/ Pär</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,</p>
<p>It is about 313 years late for being an innovation as such, obviously, but a re-discovery perhaps? Having tried the X4+1 at Bruichladdich, it is obviously not yet a whisky such as we know it. But it is on its way. And if one just adds another distillation to Auchentoshan or Hazelburn, it would very much still be a whisky, only stronger in alcohol and even more refined. It would not be akin to vodka, I&#8217;d say, after only one more distillation, provided there is a decently wide spirit cut etc.</p>
<p>I think it is a fair extension and the excitement and debate it has produced would suggest it is also commercially viable. Bit rich on the hype, perhaps, but then again, I&#8217;m not too keen on much marketing these days anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>I will be interested in trying this. Pity it wasn&#8217;t released at full blaze strength though. One point of sale lost, if I may say so.</p>
<p>/ Pär</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

